Re: [PATCH 2/7] Add assertion checking macros

[David Howells]

Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hmm, but why not have a single something-like-"ASSERT" doing the same as
> in userspace:

Because I want to print the values that were checked.  Your suggestion merely
turns the unevaluated expression into a string and prints that.  The values
are very useful to know in debugging the problem.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/