Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address isinvalid

From: Matthew Garrett
Date: Tue Oct 11 2011 - 09:03:41 EST

Next message: Mark Brown: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the moduleh tree"
Previous message: HAYASAKA Mitsuo: "Re: [RFC PATCH net 1/2] [BUGFIX] bonding: use local function pointerof bond->recv_probe in bond_handle_frame"
In reply to: Matt Fleming: "[PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address is invalid"
Next in thread: Matt Fleming: "Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address isinvalid"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Is there any chance of unifying the 32 and 64-bit code here as well?

--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Brown: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the moduleh tree"
Previous message: HAYASAKA Mitsuo: "Re: [RFC PATCH net 1/2] [BUGFIX] bonding: use local function pointerof bond->recv_probe in bond_handle_frame"
In reply to: Matt Fleming: "[PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address is invalid"
Next in thread: Matt Fleming: "Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd address isinvalid"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]