Re: [PATCH] staging:rts_pstor:Fix SDIO issue

[Dan Carpenter]

Adding the check for if (sd_check_err_code(chip, SD_NO_CARD)) is
good, but introducing the new "reset_pass" variable is wrong.

I don't think you are updating the new variable consistently on
all paths.  For example, if it's a 0x5209 chip and the code is like
this:
                   retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
                   if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
                   	TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);
                   }

In the old system that was considered a successful reset, but under
your new system we don't update "reset_pass" here so we pass this
test and then we immediately return STATUS_FAIL because reset_pass
isn't set.  If that's what you intended then just write it like that.

		retval = sd_change_bank_voltage(chip, SD_IO_3V3);
		TRACE_RET(chip, STATUS_FAIL);

So could you write it again but just set retval = STATUS_FAIL; for
the new failure pathes.  Or better yet, just return STATUS_FAIL
directly.  So this code would be:

> +				if (retval == STATUS_SUCCESS)
> +					reset_pass = 1;

				if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS)
					TRACE_RET(chip, retval);
regards,
dan carpenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/