Re: [RFC] drivercore: Add helper macro for platform_driverboilerplate

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Oct 05 2011 - 15:35:18 EST


On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:43:02AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 05:26:55PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> For simple modules that contain a single platform_driver without any
> >> additional setup code then ends up being a block of duplicated
> >> boilerplate.  This patch adds a new macro, module_platform_driver(),
> >> which replaces the module_init()/module_exit() registrations with
> >> template functions.
> >>
> >> This patch also converts all the relevant spi drivers to use the new
> >> macro.  There are a lot of drivers in the tree that are using this
> >> pattern and could be converted.
> >>
> >> It also fixes up some incorrect section annotations where I found
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> I think this is useful, and I like the diffstat that it produces.
> >> What does everyone else think of this approach?  I can do versions for
> >> i2c_drivers and spi_drivers too.
> >>
> >> This is *not* tested very much.  I'm circulating mostly for review for
> >> now.
> >
> > The idea looks sane to me, I like the diffstat it ends up creating, nice
> > job.
>
> Thanks. Can I take that as your a-b? Can I merge it via the spi tree?

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

And yes, please feel free to merge it through any tree you can.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/