Re: [PATCH 09/10] provide a version of cpuusage statistics insidecpu cgroup

From: Glauber Costa
Date: Wed Oct 05 2011 - 08:23:36 EST


On 10/05/2011 01:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 23:21 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
+/*
+ * charge this task's execution time to its accounting group.
+ *
+ * called with rq->lock held.
+ */
+static void cpuusage_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
+ struct cpuacct *ca;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+ struct task_group *tg;
+#endif
+ cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
+ ca = task_ca(tsk);
+
+ if (unlikely(!cpuacct_subsys.active))
+ goto no_cpuacct;
+
+ for (; ca; ca = ca->parent) {
+ u64 *cpuusage = per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpuusage, cpu);
+ *cpuusage += cputime;
+ }
+no_cpuacct:
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+ tg = task_group(tsk);
+ for (; tg; tg = tg->parent) {
+ u64 *cpuusage = per_cpu_ptr(tg->cpuusage, cpu);
+ *cpuusage += cputime;
+ }
+#endif
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}

I don't actually think we need to do this. tg->se[cpu]->sum_exec_runtime
should contain the same information.

Well,

We should at least sum up se and rt_se, right?
Otherwise... I will re-read the code, but from a first sight, I think you are right.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/