Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
> > > >> should be dropped.
> > > > 
> > > > That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree.  The best I could do
> > > > is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into
> > > > auto-latest ...  I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the
> > > > tip tree in the next hour).
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > OK, let me bother Ingo about it.
> > 
> > For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the
> > tip tree.
> 
> I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have
> been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think.

We'll take it out. Thanks,

      tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/