Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:01:32 -0300
Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 09/09/2011 12:12 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Wed,  7 Sep 2011 01:23:16 -0300
> > Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> >> With all the infrastructure in place, this patch implements
> >> per-cgroup control for tcp memory pressure handling.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: David S. Miller<davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hmm, then, kmem_cgroup.c is just a caller of plugins implemented
> > by other components ?
> 
> Kame,
> 
> Refer to my discussion with Greg. How would you feel about it being 
> accounted to a single "kernel memory" limit in memcg?
> 

Hmm, it's argued that 'cgroup is hard to use, it's difficult!!!'.

Then, if implementation is clean, I think it may be good to add
kmem limit to memcg.

Your and Greg's idea is to have

	memory.kmem_limit_in_bytes 
?

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/