Re: x86 memcpy performance

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:39:18AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Kernel memcpy's are basically almost always smaller than a page size,
> because that tends to be the fundamental allocation size.

Yeah, this is what my trace of a kernel build showed too:

Bytes   Count
=====   =====

...

224     3
225     3
227     3
244     1
254     5
255     13
256     21708
512     21746
848     12907
1920    36536
2048    21708

OTOH, I keep thinking that copy_*_user might be doing bigger sizes, for
example when shuffling network buffers to/from userspace. Converting
those to SSE memcpy might not be as easy as memcpy itself, though.

> Yes, there are exceptions that copy into big vmalloc'ed buffers, but
> they don't tend to matter. Things like module loading etc.

Too small a number of repetitions to matter, yes.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/