Re: [PATCH -V6 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4

From: David Howells
Date: Fri Sep 09 2011 - 08:46:42 EST


Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> + retval = ext4_set_richacl(handle, inode, acl);
> + ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> + if (retval == ENOSPC && ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries))
> + goto retry;

Should that be -ENOSPC?

I do wonder, why does ext4 need to know about richacls at all? Surely, as far
as ext4 is concerned, they should be seen as xattrs?

If ext4 needs a mark on disk to say it supports richacls, then why can't that
simply be the presence or lack thereof of a richacl on the root dir?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/