Re: [PATCH -V6 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions

From: David Howells
Date: Fri Sep 09 2011 - 06:37:01 EST

Next message: Mel Gorman: "[PATCH 13/14] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage"
Previous message: Maarten Lankhorst: "Re: x86 memcpy performance"
In reply to: Aneesh Kumar K.V: "Re: [PATCH -V6 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions"
Next in thread: Aneesh Kumar K.V: "Re: [PATCH -V6 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +unsigned int
> +richacl_want_to_mask(int want)

unsigned int want?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mel Gorman: "[PATCH 13/14] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage"
Previous message: Maarten Lankhorst: "Re: x86 memcpy performance"
In reply to: Aneesh Kumar K.V: "Re: [PATCH -V6 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions"
Next in thread: Aneesh Kumar K.V: "Re: [PATCH -V6 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]