Re: [PATCH -V6 11/26] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:55:03 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:55:33PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Some permission models can allow processes to take ownership of a file,
> > change the file permissions, and set the file timestamps.  Introduce new
> > permission mask flags and check for those permissions in
> > inode_change_ok().
> 
> These little helper functions seem like they might be reasonable cleanup
> even without the richacl_change_ok() piece; wonder if it'd be worth
> splitting out the cleanup and applying it now?
> 
> Not that it's necessary--seems like a straightforward enough patch as
> is.

Those helpers also have richacl_chage_ok(..) done as a part of the call. So
they cannot directly be applied to upstream. But we can do similar
helpers for upstream and add richacl changes as a separate patch ? Is
that what you are suggesting. I can split this patch to two in that case

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/