Re: [PATCH 2/3] nbd: add support for feature negotiation

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Thu Sep 08 2011 - 03:00:50 EST


On 09/07/2011 11:54 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
> I named it differently intentionally, actually, because it should not use
> the flags field from the network protocol as is. Also, "features" sounds
> more like something that is optional, while unrecognized "flags" should
> probably cause a failure.
Alright, I can buy that argument -- I don't feel that strongly about it...

This looks good to me, then.

Actually no, I can do better. :)

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/