Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Wed Sep 07 2011 - 12:00:06 EST


On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:53:31PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 08/26/11 16:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:58:49PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 08/13/11 03:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Whee, I can skip release announcements too!
> >>>
> >>> So no the subject ain't no mistake its not, 3.0.1-rt11 is there for the
> >>> grabs.
>
> < snip >
>
> >> I have a consistent (every boot) hang on boot. With a few
> >> hacks to get console output, I get the
> >>
> >> rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
>
> < snip >
>
> >> This is an ARM NaviEngine (out of tree, so I also have applied
> >> a series of pages for platform support).
> >>
> >> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is set. Full config is attached.
>
> I have also replicated the problem on the ARM RealView (in tree) and
> without the RT patches.
>
> >
> > Hmmm... The last few that I have seen that looked like this were
> > due to my messing up rcutorture so that the RCU-boost testing kthreads
> > ran CPU-bound at real-time priority.
> >
> > Is it possible that something similar is happening on your system?
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
>
> The problem ended up being caused by the allowed cpus mask being set
> to all possible cpus for the ksoftirqd on the secondary processors.
> So the RCU softirq was never executing on cpu 2.

That would be bad! ;-)

Thank you for tracking this down!

Thanx, Paul

> I'll test the following patch on 3.1 tomorrow.
>
> -Frank Rowand
>
>
> Symptom: rcu stall
>
> The problem was that ksoftirqd was woken on the secondary processors before
> the secondary processors were online. This led to allowed cpus being set
> to all cpus.
>
> wake_up_process()
> try_to_wake_up()
> select_task_rq()
> if (... || !cpu_online(cpu))
> select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p)
> ...
> /* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
> dest_cpu = cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(p)
> do_set_cpus_allowed(p, cpu_possible_mask)
> # Thus ksoftirqd can now run on any cpu...
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/softirq.c | 19 14 + 5 - 0 !
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/kernel/softirq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_stat);
> static struct softirq_action softirq_vec[NR_SOFTIRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd_pending_online);
>
> char *softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {
> "HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "BLOCK_IOPOLL",
> @@ -862,28 +863,36 @@ static int __cpuinit cpu_callback(struct
> return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(p));
> }
> kthread_bind(p, hotcpu);
> - per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) = p;
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = p;
> break;
> case CPU_ONLINE:
> case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) =
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = NULL;
> wake_up_process(per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu));
> break;
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
> - if (!per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu))
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> + if (!p)
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> + if (!p)
> break;
> /* Unbind so it can run. Fall thru. */
> - kthread_bind(per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu),
> - cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask));
> + kthread_bind(p, cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask));
> case CPU_DEAD:
> case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN: {
> static const struct sched_param param = {
> .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1
> };
>
> - p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> + if (!p)
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) = NULL;
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = NULL;
> sched_setscheduler_nocheck(p, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> kthread_stop(p);
> takeover_tasklets(hotcpu);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/