Re: [patch 2/2] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/map_files/directory v6

[Matt Helsley]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:58:29AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > What additional kernel patches are required to bring that effort to a
> > usable state and where are those patches?
> 
> * The one you've already accepted with ->statfs for pipefs.
> * PTRACE_SEIZE set from Tejun (RFC was sent some time earlier)
> * CLONE_USEPID flag for the clone() syscall (Cyrill will re-send a bit later)

Is that the last CLONE_ flag? Does it fully support nesting of pid namespaces?

What happened to the idea of using the existing eclone patches instead?

Cheers,
	-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/