Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: mach-bcmring: fix build error in core.c

From: Jiandong Zheng
Date: Tue Aug 23 2011 - 13:00:15 EST


On 8/23/2011 9:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:41:51AM -0700, Jiandong Zheng wrote:
On 8/23/2011 4:18 AM, Maxin B. John wrote:
CC arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.o
arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.c: In function 'bcmring_init_timer':
arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.c:238: error: implicit declaration of
function 'sp804_clockevents_register'
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mach-bcmring] Error 2

Please let me know your comments on this fix:

Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John<maxin.john@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.c
index 43eadbc..430da12 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/core.c
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void __init bcmring_init_timer(void)
*/
bcmring_clocksource_init();

- sp804_clockevents_register(TIMER0_VA_BASE, IRQ_TIMER0, "timer0");
+ sp804_clockevents_init(TIMER0_VA_BASE, IRQ_TIMER0, "timer0");
}

struct sys_timer bcmring_timer = {

Signed-off-by: Jiandong Zheng<jdzheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Don't you mean acked-by or reviewed-by?
I meant I created the same patch and have tested it. But if acked-by or reviewed-by is less confusing, I am OK with it.


The same changes was in my comments on May 17 to Russell's serial
patches to convert to sp804 clk dev, but seems it got lost.

Unfortunately... sorry about that.

To avoid this, should I submit every patch to patch system after reviewed through maillist?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/