Re: +prctl-add-pr_setget_child_reaper-to-allow-simple-process-supervision.patch added to -mm tree

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 08/21, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> version 5:
> - add back check for &init_task

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>





Just one note, to avoid the "doesn't look correct" questions.

> @@ -987,6 +987,9 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clo
>  	sig->oom_score_adj = current->signal->oom_score_adj;
>  	sig->oom_score_adj_min = current->signal->oom_score_adj_min;
>
> +	sig->has_child_subreaper = current->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> +				   current->signal->is_child_subreaper;

This assumes that current == parent. But this is not true with
CLONE_PARENT. If a task does prctl(REAPER) + clone(CLONE_PARENT)
->has_child_subreaper == T is not exactly right.

But I think this is fine and we do not care, a "wrong"
->has_child_subreaper is harmless and it can't be 100% correct in
any case.

I believe the patch is correct.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/