Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve sequence number generation.

[George Spelvin]

>> * Should I worry about 32-bit IPv6 performance, since that's even more
>>   unlikely to be running heavy loads on 32-bit hardware?

> On x86 you're probably right, but there are other very fast platforms
> such as ARM, which are used to build routers or appliances, and which
> are 32-bit and there it may matter.

Thanks for the feedback.  Your point about routers is well-taken.
It's particularly x86-32 which gives me fits, but I'll keep ARM
performance in mind, too.

>> * If yes, is this fast enough to be acceptable, or do I need to work
>>   harder to find more speed?

> I'd suggest that the most important is no performance regression. Probably
> that if you can bring something which brings back what we lost with MD5,
> your work would gain interest.

Okay, I'll go back to the drawing board on performance.

Damn, this is going to be tough.

> I'm copy-pasting here the memo I exchanged in private after my tests, there
> is nothing secret in it, so better post the whole explanation :

Thank you very much.  It helps me figure out what the time budget is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/