Re: [PATCH] scsi: Document generic scsi device attributes

[James Bottomley]

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:00 -0500, scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:45:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:20 -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> > > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices |  123 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..ad2d36b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> > > +What:           /sys/class/scsi_device/..../device/device_blocked
> > > +Date:           December, 2002
> > > +KernelVersion:  Unknown
> > > +Contact:        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Hmm, so I get fingered for every screw up in our sysfs ABI? nice wide
> > receiver buck pass move.
> 
> Uh, sorry if that wasn't the right thing to do, which it sounds
> like it wasn't.  I just put your name there because you're the SCSI
> maintainer.  I can dig through all the commits and see who added what
> if that's preferable.  Or leave the names out?  or something else?

No, don't worry, the patch is the right thing to do ... I was just
slightly amused to see my name down for all of it.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/