Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sun Aug 14 2011 - 23:23:32 EST


On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:29:52 -0400 H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:09:56 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/31/2011 11:07 AM, Mike Waychison wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Internal-reference-ID: rdunlap.2011.0729.id1
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Mike Waychison <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >>
> >> Just to avoid namespace collisions, can we at least put the owner
> >> somewhere standardized, e.g. <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap>, <33999@google>
> >and
> >> so on?
> >
> >I would prefer to leave the text contents as unspecified, but I
> >wouldn't
> >mind recommending that users try to make them unique, e.g., by using
> >a company-ID or owner-ID. Would that be acceptable?
> >
> >
> >---
> >~Randy
> >*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your
> >code ***
>
> No, that wouldn't work when there is more than one tag from different users. And yes, I fully expect to see that.
> --

I guess that's a NAK or at least not consensus.
Would you like to submit an alternative?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/