Re: [PATCH 3/5][RFC] ftrace: Return pt_regs to function trace callback(x86_64 only so

[Masami Hiramatsu]

(2011/08/11 21:59), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:55 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2011/08/11 1:22), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Return as the 4th paramater to the function tracer callback the pt_regs.
>>>
>>> So far this is only supported by x86_64. The ftrace_ops flag
>>> FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS is added to tell the arch to save all regs
>>> to the pt_regs, otherwise a minimum is just passed back (the same
>>> regs that is saved by mcount itself).
>>
>> I guess it will be a bit hard to port this on x86-32, because
>> on x86-32, the top of stack address in pt_regs is the address
>> of sp member (e.g. &(pt_regs->sp)). I mean that when mcount-entry
>> calls ftrace_caller, it pushes an address of the next instruction
>> of mcount-entry on the top of stack.
>> In that case, &(pt_regs->sp) points the entry which stores the
>> address, instead of the return address of probed function.
>
> I'm a little confused here. What is needed by kprobes handlers?

pt_regs, which is same as what the breakpoint interrupt generates.
This means that all members of pt_regs should be filled (except ss)
as interrupt handler does.

> It should be no problem saving the sp member onto pt_regs of the time
> mcount was called, and simulate the probe as if it was put on the nop.

OK.

>
>>
>> e.g. with kprobes (on x86-32):
>>
>> [  <bx>  ] <- pt_regs
>> [  ...   ]
>> [  <cs>  ]
>> [<flags> ]
>> [ret-addr] <- &(pt_regs.sp)
>> [  arg1  ]
>> [  arg2  ]
>>
>> with this method:
>>
>> [  <bx>  ] <- pt_regs
>> [  ...   ]
>> [  <cs>  ]
>> [<flags> ]
>> [mcount-ret] <- &(pt_regs.sp)
>> [ret-addr]
>> [  arg1  ]
>> [  arg2  ]
>>
>> I think this is hard to solve without a tricky hack.
>
> Is this for handling kretprobes? With mcount, we shouldn't be doing that
> because mcount is not the place that kretprobes should be doing this.

Yeah, I know, but if kprobe works on mcount with --fentry *transparently*,
it should support kretprobes.
Moreover, if we'd like to access args on the stack, sp should be able to be
handled as breakpoint-based kprobes. and that has to be done for dynamic-
events on x86-32.

> When we add __fentry__, the arch code will be different to handle that
> and it shouldn't be too hard to make that work with kretprobes.
>
>>
>> For example, on x86-32, MCOUNT_FRAME_SAVE saves
>> flags on the entry which will be <cs> and it saves
>> mcount-ret to local stack and moves flags to next entry.
>>
>> <save-frame>
>> pushf			# save flags on CS(%esp)
>> subl $12, %esp		# skip ip, orig_ax and gs
>> pushl %fs
>> pushl %es
>> ...
>> pushl %ebx
>> movl 56(%esp), %ebx	# load mcount-ret address
>> movl 52(%esp), %ebp	# load flags
>> movl %ebp, 56(%esp)	# store flags
>
> Nope we don't do anything like this. I've already got x86_32 working
> (but maybe it needs more for pt_regs->sp) but why is pushf needed?

as I said below (inlined comment), e.g. someone who wanna chase IF,
he needs eflags.

Please note, kprobes is the function which basically provides a
breakpoint handler in the kernel. Users expect that. So all registers
should be provided as breakpoint interrupt does. That's what I said
"transparently".

>
> -- Steve
>
>>
>> call function (ebx is callee save)
>>
>> <restore-frame>
>> movl 56(%esp), %ebp	# load flags
>> movl %ebp, 52(%esp)	# store flags
>> movl %ebx, 56(%esp)	# load mcount-ret address
>> ...
>> popf
>> ret
>>
>> Hmm?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h     |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S        |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  include/linux/ftrace.h            |   15 ++++++++++++-
>>>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c             |   29 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  kernel/trace/trace_events.c       |    2 +-
>>>  kernel/trace/trace_functions.c    |    7 +++--
>>>  kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c      |    2 +-
>>>  kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c |    3 +-
>>>  kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c     |   15 +++++++++----
>>>  kernel/trace/trace_stack.c        |    3 +-
>>>  10 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
>>> index b3fcf16..0750c2a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
>>> @@ -4,26 +4,29 @@
>>>  #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>
>>>  	.macro MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME
>>> -	/* taken from glibc */
>>> -	subq $0x38, %rsp
>>> -	movq %rax, (%rsp)
>>> -	movq %rcx, 8(%rsp)
>>> -	movq %rdx, 16(%rsp)
>>> -	movq %rsi, 24(%rsp)
>>> -	movq %rdi, 32(%rsp)
>>> -	movq %r8, 40(%rsp)
>>> -	movq %r9, 48(%rsp)
>>> +	 /*
>>> +	  * We add enough stack to save all regs,
>>> +	  * and we what we need in the location of pt_regs.
>>> +	  */
>>> +	subq $ORIG_RAX, %rsp
>>> +	movq %rax, RAX(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %rcx, RCX(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %rdx, RDX(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %rsi, RSI(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %rdi, RDI(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %r8, R8(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %r9, R9(%rsp)
>>>  	.endm
>>>
>>>  	.macro MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME
>>> -	movq 48(%rsp), %r9
>>> -	movq 40(%rsp), %r8
>>> -	movq 32(%rsp), %rdi
>>> -	movq 24(%rsp), %rsi
>>> -	movq 16(%rsp), %rdx
>>> -	movq 8(%rsp), %rcx
>>> -	movq (%rsp), %rax
>>> -	addq $0x38, %rsp
>>> +	movq R9(%rsp), %r9
>>> +	movq R8(%rsp), %r8
>>> +	movq RDI(%rsp), %rdi
>>> +	movq RSI(%rsp), %rsi
>>> +	movq RDX(%rsp), %rdx
>>> +	movq RCX(%rsp), %rcx
>>> +	movq RAX(%rsp), %rax
>>> +	addq $ORIG_RAX, %rsp
>>>  	.endm
>>>
>>>  #endif
>>> @@ -34,6 +37,7 @@
>>>
>>>  #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
>>>  #define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1
>>> +#define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_SAVE_REGS 1
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>>> index 27adc2b..b77f297 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
>>> @@ -78,7 +78,16 @@ ENTRY(ftrace_caller)
>>
>> I can see below code before save frame.
>>
>> 	cmpl $0, function_trace_stop
>> 	jne  ftrace_stub
>>
>> Please pushf before comparing it. :)
>> Sometimes, the value of eflags is worth to watch.
>> I know that SF/ZF will be never used between
>> function call, so it is OK if the eflags is saved
>> in MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME.
>>
>>>  	MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME
>>>
>>>  	leaq function_trace_op, %rdx
>>> -	movq 0x38(%rsp), %rdi
>>> +
>>> +	cmpl $0, ftrace_save_regs
>>> +	jne  save_all_regs
>>> +
>>> +call_func:
>>> +
>>> +	/* regs go into 4th parameter */
>>> +	leaq (%rsp), %rcx
>>> +
>>> +	movq ORIG_RAX(%rsp), %rdi
>>>  	movq 8(%rbp), %rsi
>>>  	subq $MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, %rdi
>>>
>>> @@ -96,6 +105,18 @@ GLOBAL(ftrace_stub)
>>>  	retq
>>>  END(ftrace_caller)
>>>
>>> +save_all_regs:
>>> +	/* Save the rest of pt_regs */
>>> +	movq %r15, R15(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %r14, R14(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %r13, R13(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %r12, R12(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %r10, R10(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %rbp, RBP(%rsp)
>>> +	movq %rbx, RBX(%rsp)
>>> +	jmp call_func
>>
>> At least, pt_regs.sp must be saved for accessing
>> vars on stack.
>>
>>> +
>>> +
>>>  #else /* ! CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE */
>>>  ENTRY(mcount)
>>>  	cmpl $0, function_trace_stop
>>
>> You also need to restore the rest of pt_regs if
>> ftrace_save_regs is true.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/