Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked()

[Oleg Nesterov]

Hi Matt,

On 08/11, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> I did a tree wide scan of all the code that modifies current->blocked
> without using the set_current_blocked() accessor. This patch series is
> the result of the conversion to the new accessor functions.

Yes, this is what I was going to do, but didn't find time ;)

Thanks, everything looks "obviously fine" at first glance. except
ncpfs does something mysterious (and afaics wrong) with or without
the patch.

I'll try to read this carefully on weekend though. I do not expect I'll
find any problem, just may be a couple of nits about the changelogs.
Say, 41/41... doesn't hurt, but in fact the current code is fine as is.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/