Re: [PATCH 2.6.38-10-generic] device driver: fix oops in radeon driverdue to incorrect value from hardware

From: Mayank Rungta
Date: Wed Aug 10 2011 - 05:51:35 EST



On 08/10/2011 02:54 PM, Michel DÃnzer wrote:

On Die, 2011-08-09 at 23:52 +0530, Mayank Rungta wrote:
Added a check for the radeon ring buffer write index in r600.c which
reads 0xffffffff on resume. This results in an Oops during
radeon_ring_write. Masking the value averts this.

This problem is not seen to be fixed in 3.0 r600.c as well.

Detailed analysis of the problem can be found at -

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/820746/

---

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fa501ffc - Oops at
r600_cp_start+0x48/0x380 in r600_cp_resume+0x345/0x580 [radeon]

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c



--- linux-2.6.38/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c.orig 2011-08-05
15:39:40.824612700 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.38/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c 2011-08-08
05:29:21.744417857 +0530
@@ -2218,6 +2218,8 @@ int r600_cp_resume(struct radeon_device

rdev->cp.rptr = RREG32(CP_RB_RPTR);
rdev->cp.wptr = RREG32(CP_RB_WPTR);
+ /* protect against crazy HW on resume */
+ rdev->cp.wptr&= rdev->cp.ptr_mask;

The indentation of the lines you're adding doesn't match the surrounding
lines.
Sorry. This looked fine in the mail I sent. I shall be careful in future.



Although the same workaround is already in r100.c, I wonder if we
shouldn't rather try and eliminate all reads from the CP_RB_WPTR
register, at least other than for debugging purposes. Alex, what do you
think?

Otherwise, this should probably be added in evergreen.c as well.


Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

[...]

No need to include all this text, just the *-by: tags are enough.

Point taken.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/