Re: [PATCH -mmotm 1/2] fault-injection: improve naming of publicfunction should_fail()

[Per Forlin]

On 8 August 2011 18:16, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Per Forlin <per.forlin@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> rename fault injection function should_fail() to fault_should_fail()
>
> fault_should_fail sounds tautological.
> fault_should_inject() is better, but I'm not sure.
> Should we retain the naming issue and go forward to merge mmc fault
> injection first?
>
Fine with me.
I'll go ahead and prepare the mmc failt-injection patches based on
current naming.

Thanks,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/