Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf: Add memory load/store events generic code

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 17:18 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 17:18 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > > The thing we're talking about is Intel PEBS Load Latency/Precise Store
> > > and AMD IBS where together with a mem op retired event (mem loads
> > > retired for Load-Latency, mem stores retired for Precise Store)
> > > provides an additional field describing where the load/store was
> > > sourced from.
> > > 
> > > Such additional data would require the addition of a
> > > PERF_SAMPLE_SOURCE field or similar, for some reason or other I was
> > > under the impression some of the PPC chips had something similar. But
> > > if not, it saves us having to worry about that.
> > 
> > It does sound a lot like our event vector, where we can have up to
> > 64 bits of information that goes with a sample. A lot of the fields
> > relate to loads and stores, but there are other fields (eg pipeline
> > information at the point the sample was taken).
> > 
> > So we could definitely use a field to capture this.
> 
> Happen to have a ref to some docs about that? We'd want to make sure our
> definition is wide enough to also work for ppc.

Anton, Paul, any word on this? I'd love to see the specs for that
power-pmu event vector thing.. It would be a terrible shame if we now
include an abstraction that somewhat matches your needs but not quite,
requiring us to either introduce another abi component later or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/