Re: [PATCH] lib/sha1: use the git implementation of SHA-1

[Joachim Eastwood]

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Joachim  Eastwood <manabian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I see some ARM asm in your patch, maybe this is the cause?
>
> No, it's just a barrier to make sure the compiler doesn't do crazy
> things, no actual asm instructions involved.
>
> That code is quite well tested in git, so I'm surprised it has any
> problems on arm. It also has zero loops, a hang sounds odd. Can you
> get some more debug information out of it (for example, where it hangs
> - maybe "initcall_debug=1" on the kernel command line?

initcall_debug=1 didn't do anything to the boot log.

But I add some printk's around the calls to sha_init and sha_transform.
...
NET: Registered protocol family 2
extract_buf: call sha_init
extract_buf: call sha_init done
extract_buf: call sha_transform
extract_buf: call sha_transform done
extract_buf: call sha_transform
extract_buf: call sha_transform done
extract_buf: function exit

These printk's come from drivers/char/random.c
So it doesn't seem like it hangs in any of the sha_* funtions.

But I never see any of the printk's I added to net/ipv4/syncookies.c
or net/ipv4/tcp_output.c.

btw, my compiler is: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 4.3.3

regards
Joachim Eastwood

> The biggest difference with the git sources is the slightly different
> calling conventions (passing the workspace array as an argument is bad
> for code generation, btw - since now gcc doesn't see that the
> workspace accesses are dead) and the fact that the kernel version uses
> kernel macros like "get_unaligned_be32()" rather than it's own
> implementation.
>
>                                      Linus
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/