Re: [RFT][patch 17/18] sched: use jump labels to reduce overheadwhen bandwidth control is inactive

[Jason Baron]

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:11:15AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 01:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > OK, so _WHY_ does that make a difference and will a next version of
> > gnu-binutils not mess that up?
> 
> The Why is micro-architectual, and I can't answer that.

In tracking this down, I eventually found that just having the
jump_label.o file compiled into the kernel, but not actually using the
static_branch(), or 'asm goto' anywhere, led to a performance hit.
Thus, the compiler or the 'asm goto' itself wasn't actually causing any
degradation. 

Since the jump_label.o file is only slow-path code, it can be moved away
from core or heavily called kernel routines. I suspect this is probably
an icache issue, but I can't say for sure.

Thanks,

-Jason

> 
> But ld will never re-order the files as given on the command-line.
> There are too many functions and tables that are constructed 
> piece-wise from input sections; re-ordering them would change
> the semantics of the program.
> 
> 
> r~
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/