Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for architectural random numbergenerator

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Fri Aug 05 2011 - 08:01:28 EST


On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 02:26:53PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> This version of the patchset uses inlines with alternatives as
> proposed by Linus. In order to avoid the issue of "random" vs
> "urandom", this hooks into *only* the kernel consumer interfaces
> get_random_bytes() and get_random_int(); this means that legacy users
> of /dev/urandom in userspace will not get direct use RDRAND, but those
> can be eventually converted to using RDRAND directly in userspace.
>
> We can, of course, still both pools randomness via rngd or a future
> in-kernel mechanism as proposed by Matt.
>
> Since there was a minor amount of confusion I want to clarify: RDRAND
> architecturally has weaker security guarantees than the documented
> interface for /dev/random, so we can't just replace all users of
> extract_entropy() with RDRAND.
>
> Git tree also available:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-rdrand.git rdrand-3
>
> Again, for technical documentation see:
>
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/download-the-latest-bull-mountain-software-implementation-guide/

FWIW these patches look good to me and I'm happy to take them
if Linus doesn't merge them directly.

Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/