Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for headerchange

[Paul Gortmaker]

[Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change] On 01/08/2011 (Mon 09:29) Mark Brown wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:44:25PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > On 11-07-29 11:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking
> > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that.
> 
> > Thanks, I'll apply it to the module.h cleanup branch that is soaking
> > in linux-next.
> 
> There's a bunch of other changes fixing issues with this floating around
> - Randy Dunlap sent something for a regulator driver the other day and
> I've got a couple of other Samsung patches I sent on the basis that this
> must have been caused by a change in the Samsung headers.

It is all taken care of, so you don't have to worry.  It isn't a change
specific to any Samsung headers.  If you are interested to know the
background of what is being changed and why, this is a good start.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/27/459

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/28/12

Thanks,
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/