Re: [PATCHv4 05/11] omap3isp: Use *_dec_not_zero instead of *_add_unless

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Sven,

On Monday 01 August 2011 12:07:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Sunday 31 July 2011 17:00:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 July 2011 11:47:44 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > > atomic_dec_not_zero is defined for each architecture through
> > > <linux/atomic.h> to provide the functionality of
> > > atomic_add_unless(x, -1, 0).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I'll queue this to my tree for v3.2. Please let me know if you would
> > rather push the patch through another tree.
> 
> The problem is that until now no one from linux-arch has applied the patch
> 01/11 in his tree (which is needed before this patch can be applied) and
> you tree have to be based on the "yet to be chosen linux-arch tree".
> Otherwise your tree will just break and not be acceptable for a pull
> request.
> 
> Maybe it is easier when one person applies 01-11 after 02-11 was Acked-by
> the responsible maintainers.
> 
> 02 is more or less automatically Acked-by us :)
> 04, 09 and 10 are also Acked.
> ... and the rest is waiting for actions.

OK. I'm fine with 05/11 being pushed through any tree with my ack. Please let 
me know if/when you want me to apply it to my tree.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/