Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for headerchange

[Paul Gortmaker]

On 11-07-29 11:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking
> the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that.

Thanks, I'll apply it to the module.h cleanup branch that is soaking
in linux-next.

P.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> index b8d1d20..3475f65 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  static struct clk *armclk;
>  static struct regulator *vddarm;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/