Re: [patch] w1: off by one in w1_f29_remove_slave()

[Dan Carpenter]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42:29AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> Is there any reason to release the data "backwards" ?
> The default way is to go upwards. that looks more readable.

I considered doing it that way.  It would work.  I throught maybe
they were going to add something where it needed to be unwound LIFO
order.

I'll wait for Jean-Françoisto say which way is prefered.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/