Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree

From: Koul, Vinod
Date: Tue Jul 26 2011 - 23:54:55 EST


On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:08 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got a conflict in
> drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c (called drivers/spi/amba-pl022.c in the sleav-dma
> tree) between commit 083be3f05371 ("spi/pl022: initialize burstsize from
> FIFO trigger level") from Linus' tree and commit 001b0585ff16 ("Improve
> slave/cyclic DMA engine documentation") from the slave-dma tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) anc acn carry the fix as necessary.

The correct fix would be:

diff --cc drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
index eba88c7,99e7880..0000000
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
@@@ -910,11 -908,11 +910,9 @@@ static int configure_dma(struct pl022 *
{
struct dma_slave_config rx_conf = {
.src_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
+ .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
};
struct dma_slave_config tx_conf = {
.dst_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
.direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
- .dst_maxburst = pl022->vendor->fifodepth >> 1,
};
unsigned int pages;
int ret;

For now the direction flags remains to be set and checked is in both
tree so should not cause conflict.
I will rebase my tree tonight to 3.0, that should resolve conflict as
well

--
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/