Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN()and KCONFIG_MODULE()

From: AmÃrico Wang
Date: Tue Jul 26 2011 - 09:02:00 EST


On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Replace the config_is_*() macros with a variant that allows for grepping
> for usage of CONFIG_* options in the code. Usage:
>
> Âif (KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA))
>
> or
>
> Â#if KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA)
>
> The KCONFIG() macro evaluates to 1 if the argument is set (to either 'y'
> or 'm'), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG_MODULE() test if the respective
> option is 'y' and 'm', respectively.

I think it's better to let KCONFIG_MODULE() returns true only for =m, so that
KCONFIG() will equal to KCONFIG_BUILTIN() || KCONFIG_MODULE().

BTW, the name KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) seems ugly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/