Re: [RFC PATCH] futex: replace get_user_pages() with get_user_pages_fast()

From: Darren Hart
Date: Thu Jun 23 2011 - 11:11:10 EST




On 06/22/2011 11:21 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any reason to take mmap_sem explicitly here?
> Should we change gup_fast() to allow NULL argument (ie for avoid get_page)?
>
> ============================
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> get_user_pages(current, current->mm)
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
> and
>
> get_user_pages_fast()
>
> make an equivalent result, And latter would be better when mamp_sem
> highly contended case, because it can avoid to take mmap_sem if
> the target page doesn't need a page fault.


I can't speak authoritatively here, but it seems to me that
get_user_pages_fast falls back to get_user_pages with mmap_sem anyway,
so this seems like a reasonable optimization for the best case, with a
minor overhead for the slow case.

Peter, am I missing something? Is there a reason you left this as is
during your fast gup futex update?

>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index fe28dc2..9f7b1ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -351,13 +351,11 @@ static inline void put_futex_key(union futex_key *key)
> */
> static int fault_in_user_writeable(u32 __user *uaddr)
> {
> - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> int ret;
> + struct page *page;
>
> - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> - ret = get_user_pages(current, mm, (unsigned long)uaddr,
> - 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + ret = get_user_pages_fast((unsigned long)uaddr, 1, 1, &page);
> + put_page(page);
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/