Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc3

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Geert,

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:30:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:19:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to build with `make -k', so it continues in case
> > of an error, and
> > tries to build as much as possible?
> > Yes, I know this may increase build time considerably, but in an ideal
> > world, there
> > are no compile errors and everything is built anyway ;-)
> 
> Done (I think - it required very simple changes to a Python script and I
> only do "monkey see, monkey do" Python programming :-))

I also made the mistake of fixing things so that the automatic "git
bisect for build failures" would work.  That was taking much too much
time (over 4 hours for one build), so I have turned it off.  Hopefully,
the builds will now run in a more reasonable time frame.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature