Re: [patch 03/16] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFSbandwidth tracking

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 00:16 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +       {
> +               .name = "cfs_quota_us",
> +               .read_s64 = cpu_cfs_quota_read_s64,
> +               .write_s64 = cpu_cfs_quota_write_s64,
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "cfs_period_us",
> +               .read_u64 = cpu_cfs_period_read_u64,
> +               .write_u64 = cpu_cfs_period_write_u64,
> +       },
> +#endif 

Did I miss a reply to:
lkml.kernel.org/r/1305538202.2466.4047.camel@twins ? why does it make
sense to have different periods per cgroup? what does it mean?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/