Re: [PATCH v3] pch_gpio: Support interrupt function

[Alexander Stein]

On Wednesday 22 June 2011 10:14:10 Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> (2011/06/22 15:28), Alexander Stein wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 02:10:28 Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> >> (2011/06/21 18:10), Alexander Stein wrote:
> >>> I wrote a small program which use poll(2) on value, after edge hase
> >>> been configured from shell. I cannot test the edge detection
> >>> appropriately due to debouncing using jumpers.
> >> 
> >> Really ?
> >> In out test environment, my test program could detect edge interrupt
> >> correctly.
> > 
> > My test program used poll/select on edge successfully. But I could not
> > test the raising or falling feature actually, as my input is bouncing.
> > So, it doesn't matter if I set both/raising/falling in edge, due to my
> > inputs the effect is the same. Any input event will end in several
> > raising and falling interrupts events.
> > I hope I could make this more clear.
> 
> Our test program also uses poll (We don't use select().)

I noticed poll/select work nearly as the same. Both worked fine here.

> BTW, is the above your saying related to your patch "[PATCH] pch_gpio:
> transform mutex into spinlock" ?

Should be unrelated. I did the GPIO interrupt test before stumbling on the 
mutex/spinlock problem. The latter one was caused by setting a GPIO from 
interrupt context (in a different driver).

Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/