Re: [PATCH 1/2] config: omap2+: force fb and dss support as built-in

From: Tushar Behera
Date: Tue Jun 21 2011 - 01:00:30 EST


On Monday 20 June 2011 06:34 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
In certain board files, there are references to vram related functions
which are defined in drivers/video/omap2/vram.c. Because of this direct
dependency, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 should be a built-in feature.

arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/vram.h defines dummy inline function in
case vram.c is not compiled in, so the board files should compile fine.

As per the current architecture, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 is dependent on
CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS. Hence CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS support should also be selected
by default.

The configuration is fine as it is. And anyway, if things do not compile
when something is configured as a module, the correct fix is hardly just
changing the feature to be compiled built-in =).
Agreed. :)
I am not an expert in DSS. I just wanted to raise my concern.

Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Samreen<samreen@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera<tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `rx51_video_mem_init':
linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:97: undefined reference to `omap_vram_set_sdram_vram'
arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_reserve':
linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:66: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock'
arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_detect_sram':
linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:179: undefined reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sram'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2

Compiles fine for me. Perhaps you are using some old kernel?
As mentioned in the cover letter, we get this error only if 2/2 is applied and 1/2 is not applied.

I tested this by applying 2/2 on v3.0-rc4 and using omap2plus_defconfig.

Tomi




--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/