Does the printk fit on one line if you do
pr_warn_ratelimited(...)
instead?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
No I'm affraid. I tried it, but it didn't fit the 80 chars per line
code-styling.
Why not pr_warn_ratelimited()?
WBR, Sergei
I just kind of ignored it. As you see, I built it in.
Here my new patch:
Since printk_ratelimit() shouldn't be used anymore (see comment in
include/linux/printk.h), replace it with printk_ratelimited().
Signed-off-by: Manuel Zerpies <manuel.f.zerpies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c b/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c
index 6f218e01..c9e69d7 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include<linux/ide.h>
#include<linux/scatterlist.h>
#include<linux/gfp.h>
+#include<linux/ratelimit.h>
#include<scsi/scsi.h>
@@ -200,9 +201,8 @@ void ide_prep_sense(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq)
err = blk_rq_map_kern(drive->queue, sense_rq, sense, sense_len,
GFP_NOIO);
if (unlikely(err)) {
- if (printk_ratelimit())
- printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "%s: failed to map sense "
- "buffer\n", drive->name);
+ pr_warn_ratelimited(PFX "%s: failed to map sense buffer\n",
+ drive->name);
return;
}