Re: [PATCH v4] ahci: move ahci_sb600_softreset to libahci.c andrename it

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Yuan.

Yeap, almost there, just few very minor things. :)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:06:41PM +0800, Yuan-Hsin Chen wrote:
>  static struct ata_port_operations ahci_sb600_ops = {
>  	.inherits		= &ahci_ops,
> -	.softreset		= ahci_sb600_softreset,
> -	.pmp_softreset		= ahci_sb600_softreset,
> +	.softreset		= ahci_pmp_retry_srst_softreset,
>  };

Why doesn't sb600 just use ahci_pmp_retry_srst_ops?

> @@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ extern struct device_attribute *ahci_sdev_attrs[];
>  	.sdev_attrs		= ahci_sdev_attrs
>  
>  extern struct ata_port_operations ahci_ops;
> +extern struct ata_port_operations ahci_pmp_retry_srst_ops;

Heh, I know I suggested that name but that is one ugly name.  If
anyone has any better idea, please come forward.

> @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static void ahci_pmp_attach(struct ata_port *ap);
>  static void ahci_pmp_detach(struct ata_port *ap);
>  static int ahci_softreset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int *class,
>  			  unsigned long deadline);
> +static int ahci_pmp_retry_srst_softreset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int *class,
> +			  unsigned long deadline);

srst equals softreset, so ahci_pmp_retry_softreset() should do.

> +struct ata_port_operations ahci_pmp_retry_srst_ops = {
> +	.inherits		= &ahci_ops,
> +	.softreset		= ahci_pmp_retry_srst_softreset,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ahci_pmp_retry_srst_ops);
> +
>  struct ata_port_operations ahci_ops = {
>  	.inherits		= &sata_pmp_port_ops,

Maybe it's better to place ahci_pmp_retry_srst_ops after ahci_ops?

> +static int ahci_pmp_check_ready(struct ata_link *link)

It would be better if the name reflects that it's not for specific
workaround.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/