Re: [PATCH] FRV: Hook up gpiolib support

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Fri Jun 17 2011 - 06:54:57 EST


On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:50:59AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > And to repeat what I said: the generic header prototypes everything it
> > needs before it uses it so there should be no problem here, it's not
> > been a problem on the other architectures using this code verbatim.
> > Please be more specific.
>
> Okay:
>
> CC drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.o
> In file included from /data/frv/linux-2.6-frv/arch/frv/include/asm/gpio.h:21,
> from include/linux/gpio.h:8,
> from drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:17:
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h: In function 'gpio_get_value_cansleep':
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h:233: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value'
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h: In function 'gpio_set_value_cansleep':
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h:239: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_set_value'
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c: In function 'gpio_flash_probe':
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:234: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_request'
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:238: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_free'
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:242: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_direction_output'
>
>
> Let me expand on my explanation earlier:
>
> (1) asm-generic/gpio.h has an _inline_ function:
>
> static inline int gpio_get_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio)
> {
> might_sleep();
> return gpio_get_value(gpio);
> }
>
> (2) gpio_get_value() is implemented in asm/gpio.h. It is not declared in
> asm-generic/gpio.h.
>
> (3) Therefore, the #inclusion of asm-generic/gpio.h must come _after_ the
> implementation of gpio_get_value() in asm/gpio.h.
>
> (4) asm/gpio.h implements the aforementioned inline function:
>
> static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned int gpio)
> {
> return __gpio_get_value(gpio);
> }
>
> (5) __gpio_get_value() is declared in asm-generic/gpio.h. It is not declared
> in asm/gpio.h.
>
> (6) Therefore, the #inclusion of asm/gpio.h must come _before_ the
> implementation of gpio_get_value() in asm/gpio.h.
>
> Thus (3) and (6) contradict.

sounds like it's time to move all that mess to one header alone ?!?
<linux/gpio.h> should be self-sufficient ?

--
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature