Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator

[Péter Ujfalusi]

On Wednesday 15 June 2011 10:23:01 Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > No human being can feel 120usec difference and I can't see how using
> > HIGHPRI is justified here (which is what the code is doing
> > _accidentally_ by using singlethread_workqueue).
> 
> Ooh, one more thing, and even if you insist on using HIGHPRI (please
> don't), you don't need to create workqueue for each device.  You can
> just create one for the whole driver in init and destroy it from exit.
> What matters is the HIGHPRI attribute of the workqueue.  The number of
> workqueues is completely irrelevant.

Fair enough.
I'll move to create_workqueue.
If we later find issues with this (in a 'live' system), we can figure out a 
way to fix it.

Thank you for your time on this.
I'll make the changes accordingly.

Regards,
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/