Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: Linux VM Infrastructure to support MemoryPower Management

[Ankita Garg]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 01:47:01PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 18:01:28 +0530
> Ankita Garg <ankita@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> 
> I'm sorry if you've answered already.
> 
> Is memory hotplug is too bad and cannot be enhanced for this purpose ?
> 
> I wonder
>   - make section-size smaller (IIUC, IBM's system has 16MB section size)
> 
>   - add per section statistics
> 
>   - add a kind of balloon driver which does software memory offline
>     (which means making a contiguous chunk of free pages of section_size
>      by page migration) in background with regard to memory usage statistics.
>     If system says "need more memory!", balloon driver can online pages.
> 
> can work for your purpose. It can allow you page isolatation and
> controls in 16MB unit.  If you need whole rework of memory hotplug, I think
> it's better to rewrite memory hotplug, too.
>

Interesting idea, but a few issues -

- Correctly predicting memory pressure is difficult and thereby being
  able to online the required pages at the right time could be a
  challenge
- Memory hotplug is a heavy operation, so the overhead involved may be
  high
- Powering off memory is just one of the ways in which memory power could
  be saved. The platform can also dynamically transition areas of memory
  into a  content-preserving lower power state if it is not referenced
  for a pre-defined threshold of time. In such a case, we would need a
  mechanism to soft offline the pages - i.e, no new allocations to be
  directed to that memory

-- 
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@xxxxxxxxxx)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs,
Bangalore, India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/