Re: [Cocci] Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: if (ret) return ret; returnret; semantic patch

[Julia Lawall]

> except that 4 of the 5 ORs are cases where we want to do the -return ret; +
> return ret; So I suppose for performance, I should actually add the +/- to
> each of the 4 cases that we want cocci to generate a patch for?

Actually, it's probably not that big a deal.  It's only rewriting the ones 
where there is a return ret just before, not all the returns in the code, 
like I was originally thinking.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/