Re: [PATCH] fb.h: ARM uses __raw_{read/write}

From: Paul Mundt
Date: Mon Jun 13 2011 - 00:01:29 EST


On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:31:08PM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> ARM provides __raw_{read/write}* functions for memory access. These
> should be used instead of the default '(*(volatile' stuff to make sure the
> memory accesses are typesafe (void __iomem *).
>
> This also fixes a number of sparse warning like:
>
> warning: cast removes address space of expression
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
I'm not sure what semantics are desirable for ARM here, so I'll wait for
Russell to reply.

This wrapping will basically mean that the fb_read/write ops are using
__raw_xxx variants while the memset and memcpy wrappers will be using the
regular read/write[bwl] routines which contain __iormb() calls. Given
that ioread/write and friends all wrap in to the normal versions with the
barriers, I would suppose that this is the default behaviour that is
desired, as opposed to wrapping in to the __raw_xxx variants directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/