On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Greg Dietsche wrote:Hmm... my 'quick' test must have been bad. I just tested again with 0.2.3 (debian squeeze) and 1.0.0-rc3 and both seem to work just with multiple -I options. As I recall, originally, the script just exited with a code of 1 in my original test...
On 06/08/2011 02:10 PM, Nicolas Palix wrote:What was the problem and what version of coccinelle do you have? To my
I am not familiar with out-of-tree development but I guess that inI decided to skip doing this in V2 of the patch. I did a very quick test and
that case we should
also add a "-I $KBUILD_EXTMOD/include" ?
cocci didn't seem to like two -I flags on one command line.
recollection, the ability to have multiple -I options was added sometime
not so long ago.
julia--
The use of -I by Coccinelle depends on the other options (likeGreg
-include_headers or -all_includes).
Such options are retrieved from the comments in the cocci files.
So the need for -I depends on the semantic patch you consider. I think
it is thus better
to be "exhaustive" in that case.
Julia, is there any performance problem in doing so ?