Re: [Cocci] Re: status of constification

[Emese Revfy]

> This problem seem to be solved.  At least, I don't see the problem for the
> following semantic patch:
>
> @@
> identifier i,x;
> type T;
> @@
>
> struct i {
>    ...
> - T x;
> + const T x;
>    ...
> };
>
> on the following code:
>
> struct i {
>    int a;
>    int b;
>    /* a comment */
>    int c;
>    int d;
> };
>
> The comment is preserved as well.

Hi,

I've just noticed there is a new version out (1.0.0-rc3), I will give it a try and let you know
the results.

--
Emese

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/