Re: [PATCH 10/14] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKBprocessing

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Thu Jun 09 2011 - 08:56:57 EST


On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Micha? Miros?aw wrote:
> 2011/6/9 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0200, Micha? Miros?aw wrote:
> >> 2011/6/9 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>:
> >> [...]
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * Limit which protocols can use the PFMEMALLOC reserves to those that are
> >> > + * expected to be used for communication with swap.
> >> > + */
> >> > +static bool skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> > +{
> >> > +       switch (skb->protocol) {
> >> > +       case __constant_htons(ETH_P_ARP):
> >> > +       case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
> >> > +       case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> >> > +       case __constant_htons(ETH_P_8021Q):
> >> > +               return true;
> >> > +       default:
> >> > +               return false;
> >> > +       }
> >> > +}
> >>
> >> This is not needed and wrong. Whatever list there will be, it's going
> >> to always miss some obscure setup (or not that obscure, like
> >> ATAoverEthernet).
> >>
> >
> > NBD is updated in the series to set the socket information
> > appropriately but the same cannot be said of AoE. The necessary
> > changes have been made IPv4 and IPv6 to handle pfmemalloc sockets
> > but the same cannot be necessarily said for the other protocols. Yes,
> > the check could be removed but leaving it there makes a clear statement
> > on what scenario can be reasonably expected to work.
>
> Ok. Then the comment before skb_pfmemalloc_protocol() is misleading.
> It should say that this is a list of protocols which implement the
> required special handling of PFMEMALLOC skbs.
>

That's a very reasonable suggestion. My thinking behind that comment
was a backwards because I only "expected" protocols that implemented
the special handling to be used for swap :/

Thanks.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/