Re: [PATCH] net: emaclite: Add missing linux/interrupt.h header

From: Michal Simek
Date: Thu Jun 09 2011 - 04:56:52 EST


David Miller wrote:
From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:15:33 +0200

Log:
drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c: In function 'xemaclite_open':
drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c:961: error: implicit declaration of function 'request_irq'
drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c: In function 'xemaclite_close':
drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.c:995: error: implicit declaration of function 'free_irq'
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/xilinx_emaclite.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>

This is only relevant for the -next tree, you should specify that when
submitting patches otherwise the maintainer not apply the patch where
it actually belongs.

sorry for that. Yes, it is for -next tree.

Michal

--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/