Re: [PATCH 1/1] [virt] virtio-blk: Use ida to allocate disk index

[Rusty Russell]

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:08:29 -0400, Mark Wu <dwu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
> Yes, I can't figure out an instance of disk probing in parallel either, but as
> per the following commit, I think we still need use lock for safety. What's your opinion?
> 
> commit 4034cc68157bfa0b6622efe368488d3d3e20f4e6
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Sat Feb 21 11:04:45 2009 +0900
> 
>     [SCSI] sd: revive sd_index_lock
> 
>     Commit f27bac2761cab5a2e212dea602d22457a9aa6943 which converted sd to
>     use ida instead of idr incorrectly removed sd_index_lock around id
>     allocation and free.  idr/ida do have internal locks but they protect
>     their free object lists not the allocation itself.  The caller is
>     responsible for that.  This missing synchronization led to the same id
>     being assigned to multiple devices leading to oops.

I'm confused.  Tejun, Greg, anyone can probes happen in parallel?

If so, I'll have to review all my drivers.

Thanks,
Rusty.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/